CSU Research: Link discovered between herbicide resistance and cropping practice

8 APRIL 2019

CSU Research: Link discovered between herbicide resistance and cropping practice

CSU Research shows a link between cropping practice and herbicide resistance in weeds, with resistance a major cost to the Australian grains industry

  • CSU Research shows link between cropping practice and herbicide resistance in weeds.
  • Herbicide resistance is a major cost to the Australian grains industry.
  • The research highlights the need to rotate chemical and non-chemical weed control.

Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation research has shown a link between cropping practices and the evolution of herbicide resistance in the weed annual ryegrass, highlighting the need to rotate chemical and non-chemical weed control.

Charles Sturt University (CSU) researcher Dr John Broster said, “Herbicide resistance in weeds is common in southern Australia and is a costly problem for the grains industry. Annual ryegrass has developed resistance to numerous chemicals and this research gives us insight into how resistance has evolved and how it’s associated with different cropping practices.”

This research brought together scientists from the CSU School of Agricultural and Wine Sciences working on herbicide resistance and weed management with experts in data analysis from the CSU School of Computing and Mathematics.

It was based on the results of 4500 annual ryegrass samples collected across southern Australia in random paddock surveys and screened for resistance to commonly-used herbicides.

Using a GIS database the researchers studied the association between the extent of resistance to different herbicide modes of action, geographic distribution of resistance across southern Australia, and farming practices in particular regions:

“This research enabled us to quantify the management practices that were linked to specific resistances.  For example, shires that grew a higher proportion of wheat had more Group A resistance and less Group C and M resistance than shires that grew a higher proportion of other crops.

“Cultural practices, including the choice of crop species, cultivation and management of crop residues, plus the soil pH influence the choice and use of herbicides and thus can either directly or indirectly influence the development of resistance over time.”

Graham Centre plant systems research pathway leader, Professor Jim Pratley said the findings should serve as a timely reminder for grain growers.

“Herbicides are a tool for controlling weeds. Their misuse or overuse have consequences and herbicide resistance occurrence indicates that insufficient attention has been paid to the rotation of herbicide modes of action and that survivors of herbicide applications have been allowed to complete their life cycles,” Professor Pratley said.

The research paper, ‘Cropping practices influence incidence of herbicide resistance in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in Australia’ by Dr John Broster, Professor Jim Pratley, Dr Ryan Ip, Dr Ken Ang and Dr Jasmine Seng has been published in the journal Crop and Pasture Science.

ABS data for the research was supplied by Kynetec.


Media Note:

To arrange interviews contact Graham Centre communications officer Emily Malone on 0439 553 385 or emalone@csu.edu.au

The Graham Centre is a research alliance between Charles Sturt University (CSU) and the NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI)

Share this article
share

Share on Facebook Share
Share on Twitter Tweet
Share by Email Email
Share on LinkedIn Share
Print this page Print

Wagga Wagga Agricultural Science